The Twentieth Century to Today · 1913 – 2005

Paul Ricoeur

利科 · Jean Paul Gustave Ricœur

The third generation of hermeneutics: the hermeneutics of suspicion and of recovery, metaphor and narrative, oneself as another, memory and forgiveness. The most generous and mediating philosopher of the century.

HermeneuticsPhenomenologyBirthplace: Valence

The symbol gives rise to thought.

Source: The Symbolism of Evil, conclusion

Ricoeur was born at Valence in southern France; his mother died months after his birth and his father was killed at the Marne in 1915, and as a 'ward of the nation' he was raised by grandparents and an aunt in Rennes in a strict Protestant household. He studied philosophy at Rennes and the Sorbonne under the influence of Marcel and Jaspers, passed the agrégation in 1935, was called up in 1939 and captured in 1940, and spent five years in a prisoner-of-war camp in Pomerania, where he read Husserl, Jaspers and Heidegger and translated the first volume of Ideas.

After the war he taught at Strasbourg and from 1956 at the Sorbonne. The first volume of his Philosophy of the Will, The Voluntary and the Involuntary (1950), described phenomenologically the relations of will and body, decision and necessity. The Symbolism of Evil (1960) turned to hermeneutics: the experience of evil can be approached only through symbols of stain, sin and guilt, and 'the symbol gives rise to thought'. Freud and Philosophy (1965) distinguished two hermeneutics: Marx, Nietzsche and Freud are 'masters of suspicion' who unmask the illusions of consciousness, while the phenomenology of religion seeks to recover meaning; both are necessary.

In 1966 he moved to the new University of Nanterre, was elected dean in 1969 and tried to talk with the students; in 1970 a student put a dustbin over his head, police entered the campus, and he resigned. For more than a decade he then taught each year at the University of Chicago, long neglected in France, and in America he encountered analytic philosophy and narrative theory. The Rule of Metaphor (1975) argued that metaphor is not ornament but the creation of new meaning through semantic clash; the three volumes of Time and Narrative (1983–5) held that human time becomes intelligible only through narrative, that history and fiction interweave in it, and that personal identity is 'narrative identity'.

Oneself as Another (1990) summed up his ethics: the self is neither Descartes' cogito nor Nietzsche's fragments but is constituted by promise, narrative and responsibility to others, and the good life is 'with and for others in just institutions'. Memory, History, Forgetting (2000) addressed the traumatic memory of the twentieth century and closed with a meditation on forgiveness. A Protestant, a socialist and a cosmopolitan, friend of Levinas, Gadamer and Habermas alike, he received the Kyoto Prize in old age and died quietly at home at ninety-two.

Key Ideas

Hermeneutics of suspicion and of recovery

Marx, Nietzsche and Freud unmask the illusions of consciousness; religion and poetry recover the fullness of meaning. Understanding needs the dialectic of both, unmasking and listening.

The symbol gives rise to thought

The deepest experiences, of evil, the sacred, the body, cannot be grasped directly by concepts, only approached by way of symbol and metaphor; philosophy must reflect starting from symbols.

Narrative identity

The answer to 'who am I' is a story. The self gains its identity in time by telling and being told, and history and fiction shape it together.

Oneself as another

Self and other are not opposed; otherness is within the self, through the body, through other people, through conscience. The ethical aim is the good life with and for others in just institutions.

Memory and forgiveness

Memory has both duties and excesses, and historiography must balance fidelity and justice. Forgiveness is not forgetting but separating the agent from the act, saying 'you are worth more than your deeds'.